What is the Difference Between IT Recruiting and Non-IT Recruiting?

12.02.2019
841

Author: Jiri Herodek
Jiri is a tech-savvy IT Recruiter and Sourcer with 7+ years of experience in sourcing and recruitment across CEE and DACH region. 

It has been more than 7 years since I have entered the world of talent sourcing and this profession has never stopped to captivate me. I would like to share my view on talent sourcing and how it has changed in the last years, the major differences between in-house and agency sourcing and sourcing focused on IT roles and non-IT roles. If I should summarize the biggest difference I would say that technology has changed, channels, market and we as sourcers have evolved too.

I started my career in a staffing agency focused on the roles in engineering and finance. It was in the year 2011 when Linkedin was still quite new for a lot of sourcers in the CZ and I had some awareness that there are some other social networks like Xing etc. When it comes to sourcing for the roles in Finance, Linkedin was quite useful but job boards were still prevalent and more fruitful so placing, for example, a Senior Financial Controller was quite easy. On the other hand sourcing candidates for engineering roles was pretty tough and frankly still is really difficult.

Some of those who are looking for engineering specialists know what I am writing about. I had to do cold-calls every day so one of the main differences in sourcing in 2011 and nowadays is technology that has evolved in terms of tools that ease our job while engaging the talent is still up to us and I think will remain up to us in the future. We have more sources of candidates now but the information is more fragmented.

Sourcing for IT Roles

When it comes to sourcing for IT roles we have plenty of places to go to as sourcers but now more than ever it is important to have enough information about a candidate in order to engage with him/her properly and choose a right channel. There is no secret that the average response rates on LinkedIn for the last couple of years have plummeted. It was also not very common to have a Linkedin Recruiter license in 2011 so we had to send only Linkedin invitations and most people accepted it. I would say that the situation in this field has changed since then.

A lot of candidates receive Linkedin invitations from the sourcers everyday and in many cases, they are quite generic so a good sourcer should go outside of Linkedin and try to approach candidates elsewhere and obtain as much information about the candidates as possible. I firmly believe that being a good sourcer is a natural talent and someone who has proper training, tenacity, and interest can achieve a lot.

You have to be a good seller, data analyst, marketer, communicator etc. so this skill-set remains more or less the same. It’s also necessary to say that the channels have undertaken massive changes even though some markets remain quite conservative and our job has evolved from transactional to strategic. I would say that sourcers are / should be considered partners. This is the major change. I can see that now we are taken more seriously.

Recruiting Agencies vs. In-House Recruitment

When it comes to working as a sourcer in-house and in the agency the biggest difference for me is in the area of processes. When I was working in the agency we had to prioritize a lot more in order to be successful and we had more similar roles to work on.

Nowadays, because of the market conditions, agencies work more on an exclusivity basis and they really choose their partners. On the other hand, the hunting ground was quite limited due to the client portfolio. In my opinion, agencies are also in many cases more open to new sources of candidates and technologies, processes not necessarily due to that monetary motivation.

Meanwhile, if you are working in-house, you have to work on all roles but you have a company employer brand that will support you in your sourcing strategy. Concretely in terms of engaging the talent, you can also be more concrete. Employer branding and EVP was not such a big topic 7 years ago.

If we speak about sourcing for IT roles in-house and in an agency, the sourcing process itself remains the same and as inhouse sourcers you have that unique opportunity to be in direct contact with a hiring manager and have some influence over the channels a company uses and you are / should be a holder of the process. Regarding sourcing for non-IT roles, the sourcing strategy is different since you are more likely to advertise your roles on job boards, choose a different medium and different conversation stale. You can also search in a CV database and then go on Linkedin so you will always have a higher inmail response rate. When it comes to the channels there are not so many specialized sources of candidates if we speak about the European market.

Share:

Other articles:

Find Candidates’ Profiles from an Email on Any Website or SaaS Platform
19.03.2019
221
Hi AmazingHiring folks! We are happy to release the update of AmazingHiring Chrome extension: from now on you can turn a candidate’s email address into social media/ professional network profile. AmazingHiring provides information from over 50 networks, so you can easily get an...
Read more
AmazingHiring Announces Integration with SmartRecruiters
14.03.2019
181
Let’s move on with our journey to the best recruiting experience – today we announce our integration with SmartRecruiters – enterprise-grade recruiting software! Together with AmazingHiring & SmartRecruiters, you have everything to source, evaluate and hire top tech...
Read more
AmazingHiring Expands Integration with Greenhouse ATS
27.02.2019
172
Can’t stop making our sourcing platform better! Great news for the current users of our integration with Greenhouse and for happy future users of both tools. Aimed at creating the best full-cycle recruiting experience we integrate our AI sourcing platform with Greenhouse, the...
Read more